School to close after six years special measures.

Nov 15  2005

EXCLUSIVE

 

SIX hundred children face an uncertain future this week.


They are not Pakistanis caught up in their country’s worst ever earthquake, Americans rebuilding homes in New Orleans, Guatemalans escaping mud slides and flooding, nor young Iraqis dealing with war and terror on the streets of Baghdad.


Southend Council voted last Thursday night to press ahead with a closure plan for a school.


Thorpe Bay pupils could be forced to leave by early next year. Split from friends and possibly even siblings, and dispersed among five schools from Shoebury to Leigh.


“They are being cast off like chaff on the wind,” said headteacher Jean
Alder, describing the decision as “a tragedy”.

But is a closing a school really cause for such concern - a school that has been under special measures for the last six years, no less?


Problems for Thorpe Bay High School begun in June 1999 when inspectors swept in and derided poor teaching and results. Just 23 per cent of children got A* to C grades. Southend High for Girls - right next door on Southchurch Boulevard - achieved 99 per cent.


Despite being placed in special measures, it wasn’t all bad news for Thorpe Bay. Inspectors described “an orderly community” where pupil behaviour around the school was “satisfactory”.


“Relationships between adults and pupils are cordial,” the inspectors
reported. “Most pupils are polite and well-mannered. In lessons, most
pupils pay attention to their teachers and generally concentrate on their
work.”


But that was all about to change. What happened when they left was
shocking. Staff exited and pupil numbers plummeted from 800 to 600. Most importantly, five police officers had to be drafted in to protect the staff from the pupil chaos that ensued. It lasted on and off for three years.


“The kids were literally running the school,” said PC Gary Bradford, one of the officers brought in.


Like any number of so called “failing schools”, Thorpe Bay’s pre-1999
problems were overwhelmingly linked to a perception of pupil
underachievement.


This is neither a mystery nor necessarily an indication of a truly failing school. Thorpe Bay takes its catchment from one of the UK’s most deprived areas.

The Kursaal Estate and its surrounding wards are highlighted on Government reports as among the most impoverished in the UK. Meanwhile the town’s grammar schools cream off the very best pupil talent in the area.


“We’re the sink school,” says Mrs Alder.


More than 45 per cent of Thorpe Bay’s kids receive free school meals.
The links between under achievemers and disadvantaged backgrounds are recognised by both education analysts and Government departments.


If poverty were not enough of an issue, almost one third of Thorpe Bay High pupils have special educational needs (SEN). Southend High for Girls has just one SEN pupil on its books.


Despite the obvious difference in what children can aspire to achieve,
special needs ratios are never taken into account when inspectors determine why a school is not attaining top results.  And its even worst than that.


Being disadvantaged is about more than being poor or having special needs. Many children have parents who have difficulty reading, an issue that can undermine the chances of homework being completed regularly or effectively, as most parents will know.


There may be no books at home, some youngsters might be emotionally
damaged, exposed to alcohol, drug abuse or even violence. Dad might be disabled, or mum might be living alone caring for five other young
children.


These may not be human tragedies on the scale of Hurricane Katrina, but they’re very real problems for the children working to overcome them.


“Many of our children have genuine issues to deal with in their home
lives,” says Mrs Alder. “For some of them it might be that they’re the main carer to a parent. Just getting into school is a fantastic achievement. How can a child be judged a failure when he has achieved a GCSE D grade where all the indicators suggested he wasn't going to get anything.”


Jean Alder arrived in 2004 and her appointment marked the turning point in the school’s fortunes. She immediately installed a new team that has
overseen a teaching regime specially tailored to deal with kids from wide
and varied backgrounds.


Among the schemes in place are pastoral managers trained to identify
solutions and forge a bridge between a child’s school and home life. Special classes are used to cater for as few as ten children.


Discipline has been restored. With pupils attentive in lessons once again, they stand up when an adult walks in the classroom and actually hold open doors for staff as they walk the corridors.


“They used to slam them in our faces,” says Clare Webber, a teacher who returned to work with Ms Alder when she saw the changes.


A £1million teaching block opened at the start of this term to cater for
the new crop of Year Seven pupils. Among the schemes being deployed at the centre are specialist year teachers employed to work one-to-one with 11-year-olds enabling them to settle in to their new teaching environment.

Parents overwhelmingly want to see the school stay open. Although many have initial reservations about bringing their children in, once they see for themselves the work going on they are soon impressed. Most of those visiting a school target-setting day in September were keen to speak out against closure.

Dave Morris, a local barber, was typical. “There were a lot of problems
 

 

archives
24-hr news-line: 07947 160007


Jean Alder, Thorpe Bay head.

here before but I’ve seen the changes. We were so impressed when we came to see what Thorpe Bay had to offer. I can’t see any problems here. The school should have been out of special measures a year ago.”


PC Bradford is still at full-time, part of the national scheme to improve the relationship between young people and the police. His four police colleagues have long gone.


“The turnaround at this school is unbelievable,” he says. “It would be absolutely devastating for the kids and the teaching staff if it closes now. Everyone has worked so hard to make it a success.”


Jean Alder and her team have put forward an alternative plan to Southend Council. What sticks in the throat for staff, and the irony of their dilemma, is that Thorpe Bay is on the verge of coming out of special measures.


Inspectors are due to visit any week and staff are convinced they have done enough to warrant a reprieve. Only it looks too late.


Southend Council leader Anna Waite said last week that the school’s dropping pupil admissions, created largely by its “failing” status under
special measure, mean the school has become an economic albatross.


“It’s just not financially viable,” she said. She is neither uncaring nor stupid.


Her authority is under pressure from Government and has been promised £6million if the closure goes ahead. When asked why she and her councillor colleagues have not visited the classrooms to see the improvements for themselves, she claimed her Cabinet could rely on the word of Ofsted, “the experts”.


She offered to visit classes if her schedule allowed last week. It did not.


“The teachers at Thorpe Bay have been working extremely hard to turn the school around,” she said on Friday. “However, Thorpe Bay School is not viable in the future and the council has the responsibility to take action in the best interests of current and future pupils in this town.”


For Jean Alder the future for her pupils is very clear. She believes the mass of “underachievers” who will soon find themselves among neighbouring schools will become lost in the system.


“They will simply not be picked up,” she says. “They say cash will be made available. But it will be difficult to give these children the sort of support they have enjoyed here. That’s partly because of the community nature of the school. It will be destroyed if you split these children up.


“None of this is motivated by what’s best for the children. It’s motivated by money, and I’m deeply worried for all those concerned.”


Southend Council has just three weeks to reconsider Thursday’s decision.

For those children, parents and staff who fear the worst, the uncertainty is yet to come.

update

faq         |        news         |        courses         |        contact        |        prices         |        environment         |        publicity         |         journalism    

©cabbageMedia